Audio Advisor takes a detailed look at the features, specifications, and performance of the Marantz SR-8002 Home Theater Receiver.

Audio Advisor takes a detailed look at the features, specifications, and performance of the Marantz SR-7002 Home Theater Receiver.

Related posts:

  1. Home Theater Audio Receiver For The Best Sound Experience
  2. Yamaha YBA-10WH Bluetooth Wireless Audio Receiver for Select Yamaha Home Theater Receivers
  3. Samsung HT-Z320T Home theater 5.1 Ch, DVD review
  4. Pioneer VSX-820-K Audio Video Receiver
  5. Pioneer VSX-520-K Audio Video Receiver
  6. Yamaha 630W 7.2-Channel Home Theater Receiver for $170 + free shipping
  7. Denon AVR 2310 CI – Home Theater Receiver Basics
  8. Denon AVR2310CI 7.1 Channel Multi-Zone Home Theater Receiver with 1080p HDMI
  9. Polk Audio RM705 5.1 Home Theater System (Set of Six, Black)
  10. JVC TH-L1 Home Theater System Review

Tags: , , , , , , ,

24 Responses to “Audio Advisor Review – Marantz SR-8002 Home Theater Receiver”

  1. twoPEU says:

    i didnt understand half of what he said and i understand english :s

    this device is too complicated…but i want it, gimme

  2. ShitFromShinolla says:

    This is a big victrola. does it play the new tapes and records?

  3. baccusboy says:

    Overall, I love my 8002, but if you purchase this model, be aware that there is a pretty major bug in the Audyssey EQ system and the subwoofer. You can do more research on the web to find the answer to that. Also, my 8002 (purchased in Asia) doesn’t have the higher-end speaker plugs in the back, so you do have to mess with bare wire. If you purchased used, be sure to clarify what speaker posts are on the unit, as apparently, some may differ.

  4. mercuryzeke says:

    picked one up on boxing day 1700.00 cnd…dont ask me ask my nabor 3doors down!!

  5. MAKKPI says:

    I have got a Marantz SR-8002…. the sond is awesome!

  6. twochaudio says:

    go cheep for movies who cares

  7. croterius says:

    it costs too much but it’s the best

  8. kynigh says:

    Very expensive. but one of the best

  9. jayman231 says:

    Onkyo is not better than Marantz you moron.

  10. joness105639 says:

    what a beast!

  11. LLostSoul1976 says:

    Get a Onkyo much better!!

  12. Win98Error says:

    It may look pretty,but,does it really put out audio performance?is this a high end receiver?

  13. raymondleeleggs says:

    cost too much

  14. 777PYNCHON says:

    $1,999 – Believe me, it’s worth it.

  15. jahhmin says:

    Beautiful. How much?

  16. AKSBSU says:

    You thought Marantz was shit? What do you have in your home theater, a top of the line McIntosh? Marantz is an awesome brand!

  17. dri321 says:

    i thought mirantz was sh!t ??

  18. rvm12i says:

    (L)

  19. rhupliftmofocp says:

    i think that way they stay looking basic and don’t age as much.

  20. pizzaisgood14 says:

    Go buy these recivers. They are awsome and produce powerful crystal clear sound.

  21. Anderskh says:

    what would Saul Marantz think ?

  22. robotwookie says:

    It looks like every other bland receiver that you can pick up at Circuit City. I do agree that both the current and last design of HK look sharp.

  23. kobetwo says:

    Marantz looks great. I like the look of HK products too. Pretty much everything else looks like crap.

  24. robotwookie says:

    Why does Marantz (like so many other receivers) look so bad. Seriously, update the look. It’s not 1994…

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>